If I get a settlement or judgment in the doctor Tameira Hollander case, donors will get TWICE their donation back.
Please see http://fdrs-debt-elimination-scam.info/fdrs-fraud-blog/donate-time-and-action-or-cash/ for a listing of donations.
If the Hollander check isn’t large enough to pay everybody, you’ll get a prorated refund.
If I get nothing, you’re screwed and I’m REALLY screwed.
I’ve been EXTREMELY busy with my answer and counterclaims (posted at CreditCourt - go to p. 5 for my counterclaims) in the doctor Hollander defamation case. You may recall that they had my main website http://creditsuit.org SHUT DOWN by court order.
On 2/10/09, the judge denied the Hollander CONTEMPT motion and ruled that I was never subject to a restraining order. While I don’t understand why I wasn’t subject to the restraining order, I’m obviously not going to complain about his ruling.
The details are at http://doctor-tameira-hollander-litigation.info/
Doctor Hollander’s attorney Irving Johnson stated in the CONTEMPT motion in paragraph 13:
Other victims of Ms. Baker’s deliberate harassment have been in contact with Plaintiff.
Guess who these unidentified ”victims” are!
Two weeks ago my notebook motherboard died and I’m working on an old Dell that’s barely usable.
I just ordered new telephone recording equipment so I can RECORD calls such as the calls to FDRS ”Dan Lyle” and PROVE that my FDRS fraud claims are substantiated if they should sue me too.
After earning only $250 in the two months that CreditSuit.org was shut down, I have BILLS to pay.
I haven’t had any money for legal research and the best offer from an attorney to represent me in the Hollander case was $7,500.
I’ve been harassed and abused by “Mathew Hilton” and Hollander’s attorneys.
I don’t like my house anymore and I decided to get a gun to protect myself. i still have nightmares and I think I almost had a heart attack a couple weeks ago.
Is my ability to publish the TRUTH and to warn others about fraudsters like FDRS, Debt Crisis Solutions and many others worth dying for?
Of course I wonder whether I shouldn’t just delete just about everything I’ve ever published, sign up for affiliate programs to incompetent morons like Lexington Law credit repair and scams like FDRS and make a TON of money.
You bet I’d rather be rich.
I just haven’t been able to ignore my conscience.
But if I don’t prevail against Dr. Hollander, I might as well just take this site down. And of course I can delete every page at my CreditSuit.org posts on FDRS and probably about 80% of all my posts — I specialize in exposing fraud, scams and systemic credit reporting and FICO scoring problems.
Every credit bureau and collector can simply demand that I remove my “defamatory” statements.
Defamatory = FALSE statements of fact
If you read my CreditSuit.org posts on FDRS, you know that I’ve taken EXTREME measures to ensure that FDRS had the opportunity to explain why it’s not a fraud. While my statements and publications are certainly BAD for their business and INTENDED to be bad for their business, everything I publish is true.
Dan Lyle THREATENED to SUE me for defamation, just like Hollander.
Apparently FDRS and Mark Cella couldn’t find an attorney like doctor Hollander’s attorney Irving Johnson who didn’t hesitate to engage in subornation of perjury to make a few bucks.
To date, Hollander and her attorneys have not identified a single allegedly defamatory statement prior to filing suit – despite my repeated requests. In their contempt motion, they claim that my publications about the suit are defamatory, but never once did they provide a single exhibit or quote of anything I published prior to their suit.
The extraordinary VILE Hollander attorney Irving Johnson wanted me to remove Hollander’s NAME from my sites.
Is it worth fighting for our right to free speech and to publish the TRUTH?
You tell me …
As soon the recording equipment arrives, I’ll make some calls on FDRS and the status of the AG investigation.
I’d really like to see some people put up a FIGHT when creditors sue them and NAME in the lawsuit 3rd party defendants and counterclaim defendants such as Mark Cella, FDRS, the California AG, Genesis Communications if that’s where they heard the ads, etc.


